Abbu Ansari @ Abu Ansari @ Abuhasan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68460 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2021 Thana- SONBERSA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== ABBU ANSARI @ ABU ANSARI @ ABUHASAN S/o Haider Ansari Resident of Village- Bandar Jhula, P.S.- Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uday Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State assisted by learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 376, 313, 420, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the learned court below.

As per the prosecution case, on the assurance of marriage by one Abbu Hasan the informant left her husband and began to live with him. In the meantime, she became pregnant but all the accused persons destroyed her pregnancy without giving information to her parents and thereafter drove her out from the house and threatened for dire consequences if she will disclose this fact to anyone. It is further alleged that on panchayat she was being demanded Rs.5,00,000/- as dowry from the accused persons.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68460 of 2021(5) dt.14-02-2023 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that there is a compromise between the parties and the victim is also residing with the petitioner in the same house, this fact is also not denied by learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. He further submits that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application. Learned APP for the State opposes for prayer for bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with Sonbarsa P.S. Case No.169/2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T