Sarful Majeed v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16869 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Sarful Majeed, retired Assistant Engineer/S.D.O. Head Works Sub-Division- 4, Balmiki Nagar, West Champaran, Son of Late Md. Haneef, resident of villageJogia, P.O.- Jogia, P.S.- Ramnagar, District- West Champaran, presently residing in Mohalla- Jawahar Nagar, House No. 2, Road No. 8/B, P.O.+P.S.- Mango, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum, Jharkhanda .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna

2. The Engineer-in-Chief (North), Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna

3. The Accountant General (A AND E), Bihar, Patna

4. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, G.P.F., Pant Bhawan, Patna

5. The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Balmiki Nagar, West Champaran

6. The Superintending Engineer, Gandak Project, Circle Balmiki Nagar, West Champaran

7. The Executive Engineer, Head Works Division, Balmiki Nagar, West Champaran

8. The District Provident Fund Officer, Bettiah, West Champaran

9. The District Provident Fund Officer, Saran, Chapra

10. The Accountant General (AANDE), Jharkhand, Ranchi .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr Shabbir Ahmad Mr. Nesar Ahmad For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md. Faiz Ahmad, AC to GP 14 Mr Amar Nath Singh =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 22-08-2016 If the petitioner is not satisfied with the final payment of his GPF and he still imagines that something is still due in terms of the GPF deduction and interest calculation, he is free to approach the Director, Provident Fund, Government of Bihar to understand the accounts and then if any discrepancy arises, the Director, Provident

Patna High Court CWJC No.16869 of 2014 dt.22-08-2016 2/2 Fund will do what is necessary to be done. This order has been passed irrespective of the stand emerging in the counter affidavit contrary to any claim being maintained through the present writ application. If the petitioner approaches the Director, an early resolution of the doubt of the petitioner with regard to his claim will be made preferably within a month of petitioner approaching the Director, Provident Fund.

Writ is disposed of with the above direction. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 22.8.2016 Transmission Date