Paras Nath Gupta v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13866 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.
Paras Nath Gupta Son of Late Bhawani Dayal Gupta Resident of Kauriram, P.S.-Mohania, District-Kaimur at Bhabua 2.
Ashok Kumar Gupta Son of Late Vijay Bahadur Gupta Resident of Kauriram, P.S.-Mohania, District-Kaimur at Bhabua 3.
Ganesh Prasad Gupta Son of Late Vijay Bahadur Gupta Resident of Kauriram, P.S.-Mohania, District-Kaimur at Bhabua 4.
Sanjay Kumar Son of Late Shatrughn Prasad Gupta Resident of Kauriram, P.S.-Mohania, District-Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Rural Work, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Rural Work, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Collector Cum-District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua. 4.
The Distirct Planning Officer, Kaimur at Bhabua 5.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Mohania, District-Kaimur at Bhabua. 6.
The Executive Engineer, Local Area, Engineerin Organization Work Division, Kaimur at Bhabua.
7.
The Block Development Officer, Mohania, District-Kaimur at Bhabua. 8.
The Circle Officer, Mohania, District-Kaimur at Bhabua. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Ajay ( Ga 5 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This writ application has been filed for issuance of direction to the respondent authorities to show cause as to why the construction of Road is being made under the scheme of "The Chief Minister Area Development" on the the raiyati land
Patna High Court CWJC No.13866 of 2023(2) dt.21-12-2023 2/2 of the petitioners and also to remove the construction of road on the private land of the petitioners or pay compensation after acquiring the land in question .
3 . After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ application to file a fresh representation before the respondent No. 3 The Collector Cum-District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua .
4. In view of the limited prayer made on behalf of the petitioners, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners that they shall file a fresh representation before the respondent No. 3 (The Collector Cum-District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua), within a period of six weeks from today. 5 . In the event, such representation is filed before the respondent No. 3 (The Collector Cum-District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua), the same shall be dispose of in accordance with law after hearing all the parties preferably within a further period of six months from the date of receipt/filing of the representation .
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U