Puja Kumari And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44020 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -363 Year- 2016 Thana -BELAGANJ District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Puja Kumari, Daughter of Shambhu Thakur,

2. Kali Saw, Son of Late Prabhu Saw, Both are resident of villageDhanama, P.S.- Belaganj, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivendra Prasad For the State : Dr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 09-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Belaganj P.S. Case No. 363 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections-304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner No. 1 is unmarried Nanad whereas petitioner No. 2 is co-villager of the deceased.

In the written report, there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Belaganj P.S.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44020 of 2017 (3) dt.09-10-2017 2/2 Case No. 363 of 2016 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateXI, Gaya subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T