← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3850/2014disposed

Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-11-01Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3850 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11246 of 2013 ====================================================== Archana Kumari Wife of Late Shyam Kishore Kumar @ Anuj Kumar R/o Village-Jhaman Bigha, P.O.-Bhaik, P.S.-Makhdumpur, Distt.-Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. R.K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Human Resource Development Department.

3. Ram Bujhavan Chaudhary, The Director Secondary Education, Bihar Patna.

4. Abhay Kumar Singh, The District Magistrate, Aurangabad.

5. Sri Medo Das, The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Magadh Division, Patna.

6. Ram Parwesh Singh, The District Education Officer, Aurangabad.

7. Vidya Sagar Singh, The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Aurangabad.

8. Prawin Kumar, The District Provident Fund Officer, Aurangabad.

9. Sri Abhay Kumar, The Treasury Officer, Aurangabad.

10. P.K.Singh, The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

11. Jyoti Kumari Wife of Shyam Kishore Kumar @ Anuj Kumar R/o Vill.- Jhaman Bigha, P.O.-Bhaik, P.S.-Makhdumpur, Distt.-Jehanabad. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mukul Mohan Jha, AC to GP-27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 01-11-2018 No one appears for the petitioner to press this application.

Learned counsel for the State is present and has drawn the attention of this Court towards Annexure-A to the show cause filed on behalf of District Programme Officer (Establishment), Aurangabad (Opposite Party No. 7). It appears

Patna High Court MJC No.3850 of 2014 (6) dt.01-11-2018 2/2 that in compliance of the order of the learned writ court opposite party no. 7 has passed the reasoned order and has given effect to the same to make consequential payments in terms of his decisions.

In view of the above facts and circumstances, the contempt application is dropped.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) R.R.Ojha/Ved/- U