Vipin Ray @ Vipin Kumar Ray And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39245 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -37 Year- 2014 Thana -DARBHANGA District- DARBHANGA ======================================================

1. Vipin Ray @ Vipin Kumar Ray.

2. Md. Tinku son of Md. Pyare.

3. Amit Verma son of Hare Krishna Verma @ Balkrishn Prasad, all resident of Mohalla-Nagmandir Mishratola, P.S. Town, and DistrictDarbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sachchida Nand Lal Karan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sharda Kumari (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 27-03-2015 Mr. Mallik, the learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the anticipatory bail application with regard to petitioner no. 2 Md. Tinku.

The prayer for anticipatory bail with regard to petitioner no. 2 Md. Tinku is rejected.

Heard Mr. Mallik, learned counsel for the petitioner nos. 1 and 3, on the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 384, 386/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39245 of 2014 (2) dt.27-03-2015 that the allegation of demand of extortion money has been wrongly made rather the petitioners demanded their own amount which was due upon the informant for the deal of the land. It has also been submitted that the petitioner have been falsely implicated in the case. It has also been pointed out that the injuries on the body of the informant have been found to be simple. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

After considering the facts and the submissions including the criminal history as mentioned in the application, this Court is not persuaded to grant anticipatory bail as prayed by the petitioners.

Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner nos. 1 and 3 for anticipatory bail in connection with Darbhanga Nagar P.S. Case No. 37 of 2014 corresponding G.R. No. 484/14 A.B.P. No. 230/2014 pending in the court of the learned C.J.M. Darbhanga is rejected.

(V. Nath, J) Devendra/- U T