Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61852 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2025 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== Ravi Kumar, aged about 23 years, Gender-Male, Son of Manoj Kumar Shah, Resident of village - Jamuna Musehari, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 10-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 65 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under Section 309(4) of the BNS, 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, four unknown persons snatched mobile phones and also snatched Rs. 33,336/- from the informant and one Aditya Bharti.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has falsely been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion. He submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and there is no any specific allegation against the petitioner and the allegation made in the FIR are general and omnibus in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61852 of 2025(3) dt.10-12-2025 2/3 nature against unknown. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He next submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the alleged place of occurrence and was remanded in this case from Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case no. 100 of 2025. He lastly submits that there is no any eye witness of the alleged occurrence and the witnesses examined by the police are the spy of police. During investigation no Test Identification Parade has been conducted till date. Petitioner is in custody since 15.04.2025.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
6. From perusal of the FIR, case diary and the impugned order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Saran at Chapra dated 01.07.2025, it appears that petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name transpired in this case during the course of investigation. From perusal of the records, it appears that on the basis of written report of the informant, FIR has been registered under Section 309(4) of the BNS against four unknown persons. During investigation the name of the petitioner has been surfaced in this case only on the basis of suspicion. Petitioner is in custody since 15.04.2025 and no recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioner, so
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61852 of 2025(3) dt.10-12-2025 3/3 considering all these aspects of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 65 of 2025, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall present before the Trial Court on each and every date till conclusion of the Trial. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Anand Kr.
U T