Ranjit Singh @ Karu Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.37031 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -48 Year- 2015 Thana -SILAO District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================
1. Ranjit Singh @ Karu Singh Son of Late Ramashray Singh, resident of village Ghostawan, P.S. Silao, District Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan(Spl.Pp) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is in custody in Silao P.S.Case No.48 of 2015 registered under Sections 366A/368 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(x) of SC/ST Act, pending in the court of Smt. Rashmi Verma, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class,Biharsharif. The allegation against the petitioner is that he kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 26.3.2015. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case due to mistake of fact. The present case relates to the affairs between the petitioner and the victim and for the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37031 of 2015 (3) dt.07-10-2015 2/2 purpose of marriage they had eloped.
On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the victim girl has been examined under Section 164 Cr.P.C where she has alleged that she was abducted by the petitioner and subsequently taken to different places and in course of investigation she was rescued by the police. Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and same is rejected. However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order. (Sudhir Singh, J) singh/- U T