← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/3225/2025dismissed

Sanjay Ram @ Sanjay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-23Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3225 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2025 Thana- Kadirganj P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

Sanjay Ram @ Sanjay Singh Son of Late Meva singh Resident of Village - Poura, P.S. - Kadirganj, Dist. - Nawada.

2.

Rajnish Kumar Son of Ranjit Singh Resident of Village - Poura, P.S. - Kadirganj, Dist. - Nawada.

3.

Pankaj Kumar Son of Dinesh Singh Resident of Village - Poura, P.S. - Kadirganj, Dist. - Nawada.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Amit Ranjan For the Respondent/s :

Mrs. Usha Kumari 1 Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay For the Informant :

Mr. Saurabh Barial ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the appellants, the learned Spl. P.P. for the State and the learned counsel for the informant.

2. This appeal is preferred against the order dated 01.07.2025 passed by the learned Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST (POA)Act, Nawada passed in A.B.P. No. 1353 of 2025 in connection with Kadirganj P.S. Case No. 39 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 74, 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and under Sections 3(i)(r)(s) of the SC/ST Act, by which the prayer of the appellants for anticipatory bail was rejected.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3225 of 2025(3) dt.23-12-2025 2/2

3. As per the prosecution case, the appellants are accused of assaulting the daughter of the informant at the auto stand and when the family members of the informant went to rescue, the appellants also assaulted them.

4. Considering the allegations levelled against the appellants, in the opinion of this Court, this appeal is held to be not maintainable and the same stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U