Pankaj Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35509 of 2017 (3) dt.31-08-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.35509 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -116 Year- 2017 Thana -CHAND District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================
1. Pankaj Yadav son of Shamsher Bahadur Yadav
2. Sheopujan Yadav, son of Basawan Yadav
3. Ram Awatar Yadav, son of Umesh Yadav All resident of village- Baraon, P.S.- Chand, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua.) .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Nath Singh Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Dashrath Mehta, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 31-08-2017 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Chand Police Station Case No. 116 of 2017, disclosing offences under Sections 341, 323, 325, 379, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners, who are of clean antecedents, are innocent and have not committed any offence. In fact, there is case and counter case between the parties and the injuries sustained by the informant are simple in nature. Hence, the petitioners deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35509 of 2017 (3) dt.31-08-2017 let the petitioners, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Chand Police Station Case No. 116 of 2017, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438
(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Arvind Srivastava, J) Brajesh/- U T