Putul Choudhary @ Gopal Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68743 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2021 Thana- SHAHKUND District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== PUTUL CHOUDHARY @ GOPAL CHOUDHARY, (Male), aged about 50 years, Son of Late Bakkal Choudhary, Resident of Village - Sajour, P.S.- Sajour, District - Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-12-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of eight weeks.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Shahkund (Sajour) P.S. Case No. 247 of 2021 for the offence registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 45 liters wine is recovered from the back side of the house belonging to joint family of the petitioner.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68743 of 2021(2) dt.14-12-2021 2/3 petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that total 45 liters wine is recovered from the back side of the house belonging to joint family of the petitioner. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act-cum-Special Judge, Vigilance (Trap) Act, Bhagalpur, in connection with Shahkund (Sajour) P.S. Case No. 247 of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68743 of 2021(2) dt.14-12-2021 3/3 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T