Ravi Kishan Kumar @ Ravi Kishan Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56696 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2025 Thana- MANJHAUL District- Begusarai ====================================================== Ravi Kishan Kumar @ Ravi Kishan Kumar Paswan S/O Basant Paswan R/O Village- Majhaul Gadhkhauli, Ward No. 02, P.S.- Manjhaul, DistrictBegusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Manjhaul P.S. Case No. 34 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 308(4), 352, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, the petitioner demanded extortion from the informant's son, and upon refusal, started brutally assaulting him with paghariya, as a result of which he sustained injuries. It is further alleged that petitioner, assuming the informant's son dead, threw him into a nearby well.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56696 of 2025(2) dt.21-08-2025 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to ulterior motives. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 20.04.2025 and has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. Learned APP further submitted that there is direct allegation against the petitioner that he brutally assaulted the informant's son due to which he sustained grievous injuries as evident from injury report and, further assuming him to be dead, thrown him into the well.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also there being specific and direct allegation against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T