Dilip Kumar v. Rameshwar Rai And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13030 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Dilip Kumar Son of Late Lalit Prasad Singh Presently residing at Village - Kothiya, P.S. Didarganj, District - Patna, Permanent residing at Village - Hathi, Tola, P.O. and P.S. Maner, District - Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Rameshwar Rai Son of Late Bhagwat Singh Resident of Village - Milkipar, P.S. Bihta, P.O. Kamla Gopalpur, District Patna.

2. Smt. Saminta Devi Wife of Sri Uday Prakash, D/o Late Ramashish Singh Resident of Village - P.O.Kothiya, P.S. Didarganj, District - Patna.

3. Kalawati Devi Wife of Sri Birendra Kumar D/o Late Ramashish Singh Resident of Village - Chandalpur, P.S. - Bihta, District - Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabindra Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO ORAL ORDER 12-05-2016 Heard Mr. Rabindra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner.

The Additional District Judge-1st, Patna City has only allowed the intervention application filed by respondent no.1 on the ground that he has also filed a probate case on the basis of Will said to have been executed by one Bulkaniya Devi. The present probate case has been filed by the petitioner on the basis of Will said to have been executed by Bulkania Devi. Therefore, it is admitted that two probate cases are pending for decision an as such it is necessary that respondent no.1 should be added in the preset probate case. Therefore, the court below has rightly allowed

Patna High Court CWJC No.13030 of 2015 (2) dt.12-05-2016 2/2 the intervention application. As such I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed.

(Mungeshwar Sahoo, J) singh/- U