← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14878/2022disposed

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner Of State Tax, Bihar

2023-12-18The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14878 of 2022 ====================================================== Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Having its office at Ahmad Hussain Complex, P.S.- Gandhi Maidan, District- Patna through its Senior Executive Vice President, Prasad Lanke (Male, aged about 50 years) son of Shri. Narhari Vishnu Lanke, resident of Flat No.- 1201, one ICC, Island City Centre, G D Ambedkar, Near Naigaon Mono Rail Station, Dadar, East, Mumbai, Maharashtra- 400014.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Commissioner of State Tax, Bihar Having its office at Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

2.

Addl. Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal), Central Division, Patna. 3.

Asst. Commissioner off Commercial Taxes Special Circle, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. D.V.Pathy, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. P.K. Shahi, AG Mr. Vivek Prasad, GP-7 Ms. Roona, AC to GP-7 Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AC to GP-7 Ms. Supragya, AC to GP-7 Mrs. Manisha Singh, AC to GP-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 18-12-2023 The petitioner is challenging the First Appellate Authority order produced as Annexure-10. Admittedly, there is an appeal provided insofar as the Tribunal is constituted under the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005. The order is passed on 08.08.2022, and the petitioner has 90 days to file an appeal within which time an appeal could have been filed. The writ petition itself was registered on

Patna High Court CWJC No.14878 of 2022(11) dt.18-12-2023 2/2 22.10.2022.

2. In such circumstances, we are of the opinion that the petitioner has to approach the Tribunal, and since the writ petition was filed within the period of limitation on an application for condonation of delay being filed, the Tribunal shall condone the delay and the matter shall be heard on merits.

3. The writ petition stands disposed of.

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) aditya/- U