Umesh Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45767 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -126 Year- 2016 Thana -HAJIPUR SADAR DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Umesh Rai Son of Saikil Rai Resident of village/Mohalla- Dakbangla, P.S.- Nagar (Town), District- Vaishali (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vasant Vikas For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 24-11-2016 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Hajipur Sadar P.S. case No. 126 of 2016 under Section 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant alleged that he was watching cultural Programme but in the meantime Raju Rai, Pankaj Choudhary, Umesh Rai, the petitioner, and Niraj Paswan came and made indiscriminate firing at the informant. The informant got one fire arm injury on his back.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that four persons are alleged to have fired but the informant received only one fire arm injury. Raju Rai had inimical term with the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45767 of 2016 (2) dt.24-11-2016 2/2 informant. The petitioner has got no manner of concern with Raju Rai or the informant.

It appears that informant made allegation that all the four accused persons, including the petitioner, made indiscriminate firing and fortunately the informant got only one fire arm injury.

Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) BKS/- U T