S.K. Sattar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68151 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-140 Year-2021 Thana- AMDABAD District- Katihar ====================================================== 1.
S.K. SATTAR Son of S.K. Gheeno Resident of village - Raghunathpur, P.S.- Amdabad, Dist.- Katihar.
2.
Nasima Khatoon @ Nasima Wife of S.K. Sattar Resident of village - Raghunathpur, P.S.- Amdabad, Dist.- Katihar.
3.
S.K. Saheb Son of S.K. Sattar Resident of village - Raghunathpur, P.S.- Amdabad, Dist.- Katihar.
4.
Shekh Gaurav Son of S.K. Tullu Hussain R/o village - Paharpur Pani Kamla, P.S.- Amdabad, Dist.- Katihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Arjun Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Amit Kumar Rakesh Mr.Om Prakash Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 307 & other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the prosecution case, petitioner no. 1 assaulted by sickle on the head of informant, whereas, petitioner no. 3 assaulted him (informant) by sword causing grievous injury. It is submitted on behalf of petitioners that there is case and counter case and both sides sustained injuries. Both parties are pattidars and due to dispute over measurement of land, the incident took place, in which, informant sustained injury. So far as petitioner no. 2 & 4 are concerned, they is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68151 of 2021(3) dt.12-07-2022 2/2 general and omnibus allegation.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no. 1 and 3 is refused. So far as prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no. 2 and 4, as named above, is concerned, since they is general and omnibus allegation against them, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, they are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Katihar in connection with Amdabad P.S. Case No. 140 of 2021, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
This application is, accordingly, disposed of. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U T