Adarsh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59592 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-203 Year-2023 Thana- PATRAKARNAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Adarsh Kumar S/O Shankar Kumar @ Arvind Kumar R/O Salimpur Ara, Lane No. 1, Kadamkuan, Ps. Gandhimaidan, Dist. Patna 2.

Aman Kumar S/O Shankar Kumar @ Arvind Kumar R/O Salimpur Ara, Lane No. 1, Kadamkuan, Ps. Gandhimaidan, Dist. Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Patanjali Rishi, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 19-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Patrakar Nagar P.S. Case No. 203 of 2023 dated 11.03.2023, registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 323, 307, 379, 337 and 34 of the I.P.C., pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate.

3. Allegation against the petitioners is that they along with their father, co-accused have brutally assaulted the informant due to which informant sustained serious injuries upon his head, nose and eyes. It is further alleged that they snatched Rs. 5500/- cash and a gold chain from neck of the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59592 of 2023(3) dt.19-01-2024 2/2

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are quite innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case due to previous grudge. The allegations levelled against the petitioners is general and omnibus in nature.

5. Per contra, learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the bail petition submitted that in the occurrence informant has got seriously injured and papers of treatment is available in case diary. He further submits that the allegations levelled against the petitioners is serious in nature, hence they do not deserve anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The prayer for bail of the petitioners is hereby rejected.

7. However, if the petitioners surrender before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail, the learned Court below shall pass order on the same day in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) annpurna/- U T