← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3670/2016disposed

Mahalakshmi Devi v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Secretary, Education Department, Govt. Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-02Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3670 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22428 of 2013 ====================================================== Mahalakshmi Devi, wife of late Bibhuti Prasad Singh, resident of Village Bhagwanipur, P.O. Rajdham, District Purnia at present resident of Mahalakshmi Niwas Mirchai Bari, Katihar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, Through The Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. Dr. Dharmendra Singh Gangwar, the Secretary Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. Mr. Chaitayan Prasad, the Secretary, Art, Culture and Youth Department, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Patna.

4. Mr. Taranand Mahto Viyogi, the Director, Art, Culture and Youth Department, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Patna.

5. Mr. Ravi Mittal, the Finance Commissioner, Government of Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bankey Bihari Singh For the State : Mr. Syed Iqbal Ahmad, Sc-20 Mr. Mahendra Prasad Verma, AC to SC-20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 02-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In the present case, petitioner has raised a grievance that order dated 28.3.2016 passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 22428 of 2013 has not been complied with. The order dated 27.12.2016 (Annexure-A to the counter affidavit) shows that authority concerned has considered the direction of this Court and passed the order adverse to the interest of the petitioner.

Patna High Court MJC No.3670 of 2016 (2) dt.02-08-2017 This Court cannot give any direction in the present proceeding. If the petitioner feels aggrieved, he may challenge the aforesaid order before the appropriate forum. With the aforesaid observation this application is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U