Md. Jagnu @ Md. Jugnu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59010 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2025 Thana- Patauna District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.
Md. Jagnu @ Md. Jugnu, S/O Md. Abid @ Abid Ansari @ Md. Abid Ansari, R/O Village- Shibaul, P.S.- Patauna, District- Madhubani 2.
Neyat @ Marwa Wali, W/O Md. Abid @ Abid Ansari @ Md. Abid Ansari, R/O Village- Shibaul, P.S.- Patauna, District- Madhubani 3.
Sahida Khatoon @ Md. Ful ki Patni, W/O MD. Ful @ Md. Ujale, R/O Village- Shibaul, P.S.- Patauna, District- Madhubani 4.
MD. Ful @ Md. Ujale, S/O Md. Abid @ Abid Ansari @ Md. Abid Ansari, R/O Village- Shibaul, P.S.- Patauna, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Advocate General Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rana Bhupendra Narayan Singh, Advocate.
Ms. Babita Kumari, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP For the informant :
Mr. Gagandeo Yadav, Advocate.
Mr. Udeshya Kumar Yadav, Advocate.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioners, apprehending their arrest, in connection with Patauna PS. Case No. 28 of 2025 dated 9.4.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(1), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. As per allegation, the petitioners entered into
2/4 the house of the informant on account of dispute between the children lashed with lathi, danda and iron rod and petitioner No. 1 Md. Jagnu @ Md. Jugnu assaulted the informant by iron rod on her head. He also outraged the modesty of the infpormant/lady. There is general and omnibus allegation against other petitioners in regard to the assault. It is further case of the petitioners that other copetitioners extended threat while going back from the house of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that only allegation of assault is against the petitioner No. 1 Md. Jagnu @ Md. Jugnu and even as per the injury report, alleged injury is simple in nature. He also submits that neither there is specific allegation against the other petitioners nor there is any allegation of assault by them.
5. It is also stated in paragraph No. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioners have not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.
3/4
6. It has further been stated in paragraph No.3 of the petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents.
7. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioners for bail.
8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner No. 1 namely, Md. Jagnu @ Md. Jugnu stands rejected. So far as Petitioner Nos. 2, 3 and 4 are concerned, this petition against them is allowed, directing the petitioner Nos. 2, 3 and 4 above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned court below, in connection with Patauna P.S. Case No.28 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) B.N.S.S., 2023 and on the following conditions:
(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court
4/4 below that the petitioners have any criminal antecedent, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners after hearing them and getting satisfied that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents despite their knowledge of the same.
(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.
(Jitendra Kumar, J) S.Ali/- U T