Chandan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64442 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2021 Thana- RANIYATALAB District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

CHANDAN YADAV Son of Parama Yadav Resident of Dulhin Bazar P.SDanapur, Dist- Patna 2.

Parma Yadav @ Parama Yadav Son of Rajabalabh Yadav Resident of Jitan Chhapra, Rajipur, Dulhin Bazar P.S- Danapur, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 16-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 325, 332, 333, 224, 353, 307 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the learned court below. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that injury report of the informant is simple in nature. He submits that petitioner are said to be a part

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64442 of 2022(2) dt.16-01-2023 2/2 of mob but his name has been stated in the FIR by the informant, which makes the prosecution case doubtful that somebody has told the name of the petitioners to the informant. He further submits that similarly situated other co-accused person has already been granted bail by a bench of this Court vide order dated 16.08.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 12562/2022. He further submits that petitioners have got two criminal antecedents as stated in para-3 of the bail application. Learned APP for the State opposes for prayer for bail.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with Ranitalab P.S. Case No.117/2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T