Patna High CourtCWJC/8950/2011disposed

Kumari Usha @ Kumari Usha Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-01-06Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8950 of 2011 ====================================================== Kumari Usha @ Kumari Usha Devi wife of Sri Hari Narayan Rai, resident of Village - Kewatiya, P.O.+ P.S. - Dariyapur, Distt. - Saran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Director, Welfare Department Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

3. The Collector, Saran At Chapra

4. The District Welfare Department, Sarat At Chapra

5. The Child Development Project Office, Anchal - Dariyapur, Saran

6. The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Mahammadpur, Anchal-Dariyapur, District Saran

7. The Secretary Garam Panchayat Raj, Dariyapur, Distt. - Saran

8. Sangita Kumari wife of Sri Chandan Kumar Yadav, resident of Village - Kewtiya, P.O. + P.S. - Dariyapur, Distt. - Saran .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-01-2016 Heard Sri Umeshanand Pandit, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to GA No. 1.

The petitioner invoking writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has prayed for quashing of the appointment of the respondent no. 8. A plea was taken that the respondent no. 8 was junior to the petitioner in the list for appointment on the post of 'Anganbari Sevika', whereas in the counter affidavit filed by the respondent no. 3 a stand has been taken that petitioner while filing application had not submitted Intermediate certificate. Only it was mentioned that she

Patna High Court CWJC No.8950 of 2011 (7) dt.06-01-2016 2/2 had passed the said examination.

Learned State Counsel submits that since the petitioner was not having requisite qualification her case was not considered.

In view of the facts and circumstances, I do not find any ground to pass any positive order in favour of the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U