Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48616/2016bail granted

Kaushal Kumar Srivastava @ Bittu Srivastava v. The State Of Bihar

2017-01-31Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48616 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -371 Year- 2016 Thana -ARA NAGAR District- BHOJPUR ======================================================

1. Kaushal Kumar Srivastava @ Bittu Srivastava, son of Sri Mithilesh Kumar Srivastava, Resident of Village- Mansagar, Police StationCharpokhari in the District of Bhojpur, presently residing as a tenant in the house of Sri Lalan Prasad Sinha, New Area, Babu Bazar, Ara, Police Station- Ara Town in the district of Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-01-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 3.8.2016 in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case No. 371 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 25(1-B)a/26/5 of the Arms Act.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except confessional statement of co-accused there is nothing against the petitioner, even there is no recovery and the petitioner is in custody since 30.8.2016.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard the learned counsel for both sides and considering the submissions, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48616 of 2016 (4) dt.31-01-2017 2/2 five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ara, Bhojpur in connection with Ara Town P.S.Case No. 371 of 2016, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) A.I./- U