← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/956/2019dismissed

The State Of Bihar v. Shiv Kumar Datta

2024-01-16Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri,Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.956 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19899 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Sinchai Bhawan, (Third Secretariat), Patna-1 2.

The Chief Engineer, irrigation Creation Water Resources Department,Bhagalpur Zone, Office at Barari, P.S. Kotwali (Industrial Area), Town and District-Bhagalpur 3.

The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Irrigation Division, Biji Kharwa, District-Banka 4.

The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

Shiv Kumar Datta Son of Late Tej Narayan Datta Resident of Village-Dhouni, P.O. and P.S. Tarapur, District-Munger.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Deepak Sahay Jamuar, AC to AAG 4 For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) Date : 16-01-2024 State has filed the present appeal while assailing the order dated 16.11.2017 passed in CWJC No. 19899 of 2016. The aforementioned writ petition was decided in the light of order passed in CWJC No. 49 of 2017 (Manoj Kumar Singh vs. State of Bihar and Others).

Patna High Court L.P.A No.956 of 2019 dt.16-01-2024 2/2

2. The State preferred LPA No. 384 of 2018 in the case of Manoj Kumar Singh cited supra and suffered an order on 12.07.2019. Still aggrieved by the order of this Court, the State preferred Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. (s) 12956/2020 before the Apex Court and suffered an order on 15.10.2020. Faced with these facts and circumstances, present LPA petition stands dismissed.

3. Pending I.A., if any, stands disposed of.

4. At this stage, learned counsel for the State, on instruction, submitted that respondent's name has been considered for the purpose of regularization and all necessary benefits have been extended, the same is taken note of.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) GAURAV S./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 16.01.2024 Transmission Date NA