← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17870/2016dismissed

Vishwajeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-12-17Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17870 of 2016 ====================================================== Vishwajeet Kumar, Son of Sri Ashwani Prasad Singh, Resident of Sirisia, P.S. Brahara, District- Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Mid Day Meal Scheme, Patna, Bihar.

4. The District Magistrate, Purnea.

5. The District Programme Officer (Mid day meal) Purnea, District- Purnea.

6. The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Purnea.

7. The District Education Officer, Purnea.

8. The Sub Divisional Education officer cum District Incharge Mid day Meal Scheme, Purnea.

9. Amrendra Kumar Mandal, Bihar State Mid Day Meal Yojna Samiti Purnea, District- Parishad Compound, Purnea. PIN- 854301. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sarveshwar Tiwary For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy No-1 Sc13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 17-12-2018 The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 11.04.2016 issued by the District Programme Officer, Purnea, so far as the same relates to Serial no. 14 whereby and whereunder the respondent no.9 has been selected as a contractor by the District Mid Day Meal Committee in pursuance to the advertisement dated 4.2.2016. The learned counsel for the respondents has referred to the advertisement dated 4.3.2016 and has submitted that the said work was allotted to a contractor only for a period of one year and the same has lapsed, hence, the present writ petition

Patna High Court CWJC No.17870 of 2016(2) dt.17-12-2018 2/2 has become infructuous.

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents, no lis survives in the present writ petition, hence the same is dismissed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Tiwary/- U