Sheela Devi @ Aarti Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69337 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-340 Year-2019 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

SHEELA DEVI @ AARTI DEVI Wife of Sohan Rai Resident of Mainpura Kharanja Road, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna. 2.

Sohan Rai Son of Sanujha Rai Resident of Mainpura Kharanja Road, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoranjan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A. L. Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-12-2021 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Danapur Police Station Case No. 340 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304-B/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail. Earlier, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners was rejected by this Court, vide order, dated 05.11.2019, passed in Criminal Misc. No. 65291 of 2019. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are the mother-in-law and the father-in-law of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69337 of 2021(2) dt.15-12-2021 2/2 deceased and the husband of the deceased was put on trial and the witnesses did not support the First Information Report, which led to the acquittal of the husband of the deceased in the trial.

However, considering the fact that the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners was rejected by this Court vide order dated 05.11.2019, the petitioner remained absconding and have moved the present second anticipatory bail application on the ground of acquittal of the co-accused, i.e. the husband of the deceased, in my opinion, the same may not be a ground for entertaining the second anticipatory bail application of the petitioners, who do not have any respect for law. This application is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √ T √