Ajeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49306 of 2017 (5) dt.07-12-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.49306 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -108 Year- 2016 Thana -SAHPUR District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Ajeet Kumar aged about 38 Years, S/o Sri Ishwarnand Singh, R/o Gola Raod, Beechli Gali, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Radhe Shyam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Meena Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 07-12-2017 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Shahpur Police Station Case No. 108 of 2016, disclosing offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B)of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner and no specific overt act is attributed to him. In fact, the dispute between the parties relates to a piece of land and on account of that both the parties have filed case and counter case, which is evident from annexure-2 and 3. The petitioner has not taken even a single penny from the informant. Hence, the petitioner
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49306 of 2017 (5) dt.07-12-2017 deserves the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioner along with others have cheated the informant and grabbed his money by playing fraud. The petitioner has got several antecedents of similar nature which is evident from paragraph-3 of the petition and paragraph2 of the supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail of this petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of this petitioner is rejected.
(Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T