Navin Yadav @ Navin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59964 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2024 Thana- Panchanpur District- Gaya ====================================================== Navin Yadav @ Navin Kumar S/o Parmeshwar Yadav R/o Village- Karhara, P.S.- Panchanpur, District- Gaya (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Panchanpur P.S. Case No. 146 of 2024 dated 14.11.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 303(2) of the B.N.S.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons formed an unlawful assembly and assaulted the informant and his family members with lathi, danda, iron rod and butt of pistol. It is further alleged that the accused persons took out Rs. 2000/- from the pocket of the informant and snatched gold chain from his neck.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59964 of 2025(2) dt.03-09-2025 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that there is a delay of 16 days in lodging the F.I.R. without any explanation. There is a land dispute between the parties. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner rather the allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that the co-accused, Munna Yadav is said to have assaulted with butt of the pistol on the head of the informant due to which he sustained head injury.
The doctor opined the injuries of Dhiraj Kumar and Shiv Kumar are simple in nature whereas the injury of Anil Yadav is concerned, it is grievous in nature which is on non vital part of the body. The co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail by the Coordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 09.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 41559/2025. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 12.04.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59964 of 2025(2) dt.03-09-2025 3/3 of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Gaya in connection with Panchanpur P.S. Case No. 146 of 2024 with the condition :- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T