Pragya Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47842 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -521 Year- 2016 Thana -BHABHUA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================
1. Pragya Kumar, son of Santosh Singh, Resident of Mohalla Bhabua Ward No. 6, P.S.- Bhabua, District- Kaimur (Bhabua).
2. Mikki Kumar, son of Paras Singh, resident of village Sikathi, P.S.- Bhabua, District- Kaimur (Bhabua).
3. Gautam Singh, son of Dhawaja Singh @ Ram Dhawaja Singh, resident of village Sion, P.S.- Bhabua, District- Kaimur (Bhabua). .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Sunil For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyavarat Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 28-11-2016 Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the APP for the State.
Three petitioners are cited accuseds of Bhabua P.S. Case No. 521 of 2016 registered under sections 341, 323, 448, 504, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and pray for grant of anticipatory bail.
On mere trivial issue, it is alleged that the petitioners assaulted the informant with lathi and danda. Referring to injury report, it is submitted that except redness of the eyes, no other injury was found on the person of the informant. The petitioners, if granted privilege of anticipatory bail, would never indulge in such activities. They do not carry any criminal incident.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47842 of 2016 (2) dt.28-11-2016 2/2 In the event of arrest or surrender in the Court below within four weeks, the petitioners abovenamed are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur (Bhabua) in Bhabua P.S. Case No. 521 of 2016 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with the further following conditions:
(i) One of the bailers shall be the own/close family members of the petitioners.
(ii) In case of framing of charge, the petitioners shall appear in person on each and every date fixed in the Court below. In case of default in doing so on two consecutive occasions without any cogent/satisfactory reason, the Trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners and secure their arrest in accordance with law.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Pankaj/- U T