Md. Javed v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19936 of 2014 ====================================================== Md. Javed son of Md. Muslim by profession Business, resident of MohallaBhaluyapur, P.S.- Ara Town, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The S.D.O., Sadar, Ara 3.

The Chief Secretary, Ara Nagri Pracharini Sabh, Ara, District- Bhojpur 4.

Tabasum Khatoon, Wife of Md. Salim Khan 5.

Md. Salim Khan, son of Ahamad Khan, No. 4 and 5 are residents of Paschim Tola Choudhuriyana Ara, P.S.- Ara- Town, District- Bhojpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL REVISION No. 845 of 2015 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District- ====================================================== Md. Javed Son of Md. Muslim Resident of Mohalla - Bhaluhipur, P.S. Arrah Town, District - Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through Its Collector Bhojpur At Arrah and Ors. 2.

The Sub - Divisional Magistrate, Sadar Arrah 3.

Md. Salim Khan Son of Ahmad Khan Resident of Mohalla - Paschim Tola Chaudhriyana, P.S. Arrah Town, District - Bhojpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19936 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s :

Md. Ataul Haque, Advocate :

Mr. Anish Chandra Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Avnish Nandan Sinha. Advocate For the State :

Mr. Jay Prakash Sharma, AC to GP-21 For Res. No. 4 and 5 :

Mr. Saroj Kumar, Advocate (In CRIMINAL REVISION No. 845 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s :

Md. Ataul Haque For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar Srivastavaapp ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-04-2025 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19936 of 2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for respondents no. 4

Patna High Court CWJC No.19936 of 2014(6) dt.23-04-2025 2/2 and 5.

2. On the last occasion, the learned counsel for the petitioner had taken time to seek instruction from his client to withdraw the present writ application. The learned counsel today submits that his client has instructed him to withdraw the present writ application and hence he is making prayer for withdrawal.

3. Learned counsel for respondents no. 4 and 5 and the State have no objection to this prayer being made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. The present writ application is therefore dismissed as withdrawn.

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 845 of 2015 The tagged file of Criminal Revision No. 845 of 2015 is delinked.

2. Office is directed to put up this Criminal Revision No. 845 of 2015 before the appropriate Bench. (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) Gaurav Sinha/- U