Raju Jha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62720 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2024 Thana- SURSAND District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Amit Rai S/o Lalbabu Rai Resident of Village- Shrikhandi Bhittha, P.S.- Sursand, District - Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 63059 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2024 Thana- SURSAND District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Raju Jha Son of Nathuni Jha Village- Srikhandi Bhitha, P.S.- Sursand, DistSitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 62720 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 63059 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-11-2024 Ref :- CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62720 of 2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sursand (Bhittha O.P.) P.S. Case No. 205 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 302 / 34 of the IPC.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner alongwith other co-accused persons committed murder of son of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62720 of 2024(3) dt.20-11-2024 2/3 the informant.
4. The body of the deceased was recovered. During investigation, self-inculpatory statement has been given by one Raju Kumar, in which the details of the crime has been given.
5. The petitioner is not named in the confessional statement of the co-accused. He is in jail since 01.05.2024.
6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Pupri at Sitamarhi in connection with Sursand (Bhittha O.P.) P.S. Case No. 205 of 2024.
Ref :- CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 63059 of 2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sursand (Bhittha O.P.) P.S. Case No. 205 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 302 / 34 of the IPC.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62720 of 2024(3) dt.20-11-2024 3/3 alongwith other co-accused persons committed murder of son of the informant.
4. The petitioner in his self-inculpatory statement has accepted that he has participated in the crime. The petitioner is in custody since 01.05.2024.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the allegation levelled against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) saurabhkr/- U T