← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59980/2025allowed

Raju Kumar @ Raja Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-22Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59980 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2025 Thana- HASANPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Raju Kumar @ Raja Kumar S/o- Chandrabali Yadav @ Chandrashekhar Yadav Village- Belaun Belain Ps- Hasanpur Dist- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Madhav Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hasanpur P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

3. As per prosecution case, informant got secret information that petitioner and other have hidden the illicit liquor near the house of Rajnish Kumar and upon verification 156.975 litre illicit liquor was recovered from the hut of the apprehended co-accused Ganga Prasad Yadav and he disclosed that the said liquor was kept in his hut by petitioner and other.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59980 of 2025(2) dt.22-09-2025 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Except disclosure of co-accused Ganga Ram, there is nothing on record to connect the petitioner with the alleged occurrence. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged place of recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that seizure list has not been prepared as per law.

5. The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioner, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59980 of 2025(2) dt.22-09-2025 3/3 of learned Exclusive Special Judge Excise 1, Samastipur in connection with Hasanpur P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) vashudha/- U T