Chandan Agrawal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49511 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -72 Year- 2016 Thana -RAXAUL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Chandan Agrawal son of Sri Damodar Prasad Agarwal Ward no.13, P S Wada Pirta Birganj, District Parsa Nepal .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Guriya Nisha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Sumiran Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 08-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 72 of 2016 registered under Sections- 420, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged that a Bank Draft of Rs. 25,00,000/- in the name of Yuk Trading Company, proprietor Mr. Ravi Goel was given to this petitioner. The draft was cleared/encashed by the Raxaul Branch of SBI. Petitioner and Ravi Goel and some other have cheated the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the draft in question was in the name of Yuk Trading Company and the same was encahsed by Mr. Ravi Goel, proprietor of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49511 of 2016 (3) dt.08-02-2017 2/2 aforesaid company, as would be evident from the bank statement. Petitioner has no concern with the aforesaid occurrence.

Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not feel inclined to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is, therefore, rejected. However, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) Manish/- U T