← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68709/2021bail granted

Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-03Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68709 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2020 Thana- FULKAHA District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav Son of Kaila Yadav @ Suksen yadav Resident of Village - Bhorhar, Nawabganj, Ward No.11, P.S.- Fulkaha, Distt.- Araria.

2.

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar Yadav Son of Bhimsen Yadav @ Bhim Yadav Resident of Village - Bhorhar, Nawabganj, Ward No.11, P.S.- Fulkaha, Distt.- Araria.

3.

Vilash Yadav @ Vilay @ Suraj Kumar Son of Chandan Yadav @ Chandan Kumar Yadav Resident of Village - Bhorhar, Nawabganj, Ward No.11, P.S.- Fulkaha, Distt.- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2.

03-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioners pray for bail in Fulkaha P.S. Case No. 155 of 2020, registered for the offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, three miscreants riding on a Pulsar motorcycle intercepted the informant and snatched mobile phone, cash of Rs. 7,000/- and tempo from the informant.

It is submitted that name of the petitioners has transpired during course of investigation. During investigation, it has come that one Kapil Yadav is the owner of Pulsar

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68709 of 2021(2) dt.03-03-2022 2/2 motorcycle, which is alleged to be used in the aforesaid crime, and said Kapil Yadav is brother-in-law of petitioner no. 1 (Mukesh Yadav). Neither any incriminating / looted article has been recovered from the conscious possession of petitioners nor they were put on Test Identification Parade. Petitioners are in custody since 23.09.2021.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the bail petition of petitioners is allowed. Let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Araria in connection with Fulkaha P.S. Case No. 155 of 2020.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U T