Patna High CourtCWJC/18443/2016disposed

T. B. Control Employee Association, Bihar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-01-30Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18443 of 2016 =========================================================== T. B. Control Employee Association, Bihar, having its head office C/O Bihar Rajya Arajpatrit Karamchari Mahasangh, Gaya, Near Main Branch, State Bank of India, Gaya, P.O. and P.S. Gaya, District- Gaya through its State President Md. Jawed Akhter, resident of Shah Colony, Shahzuber Road, P.O. Head Post Office Munger, P.S. Munger Kotwali, District- Munger.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Executive Director, State Health Society, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Development Commissioner, State Health Society, Bihar, Patna.

5. The Deputy Director, Health Services -cum- State Programme Officer (Tuberculosis), Bihar, Agam Kuan, Patna.

6. The State Programme Manager, State Health Society, Bihar, Patna. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. RAMADHAR SINGH- GP25 Mr. K.K. Sinha, Advocate Mr. Shashi Shekhar, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 30-01-2017 Heard parties.

The petitioner, T. B. Control Employee Association, Bihar, claims that there has been revision of honorarium for the financial year 2015-16 vide Annexure-P3 for the employees appointed on contractual basis. It further claims that such revision of honorarium has been implemented in 18 districts of the Bihar but in other districts that has not been implemented.

It is contended that the petitioner has approached the

Patna High Court CWJC No.18443 of 2016 dt.30-01-2017 2/2 respondent no.2 on 19.09.2016 by filing a representation, a copy of which has been appended as Annexure-P8 but no decision has been communicated to him till date.

Accordingly, this writ application stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2 to dispose of the representation of the petitioner on its own merit and in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) V.K. Pandey/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 31.01.2017 Transmission Date N.A.