Arvind Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58144 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-308 Year-2024 Thana- MAJHAULIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Arvind Sah S/O Narsingh Sah R/O Village- Ojha Mathia, Police StationMajhaulia, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 308 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 302, 201, 120B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Prosecution case, in short, is that the accused persons including the petitioner committed the murder of informant's son, whose dead body was later found hanging from a tree with his mouth stuffed.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific allegation has been levelled against the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that there is no eye-witness
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58144 of 2025(2) dt.18-09-2025 2/2 to the occurrence and the name of the petitioner is being dragged in this case only on the basis of suspicion. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 16.06.2025 and has no criminal antecedent. The co-accused person has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 08.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 8352 of 2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, claim based on parity as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 308 of 2024.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T