Bidhyapati Yadav @ Bidhyapati Chaudhary Yadav @ Vidhyapati Chaudhary Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64323 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-591 Year-2022 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Bidhyapati Yadav @ Bidhyapati Chaudhary Yadav @ Vidhyapati Chaudhary Yadav, Son Of Late Medni Yadav Resident Of Village- Kanhaipur, P.S.- Mokama, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-12-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, during course of the day.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366(A), 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that petitioner along with Sumit Kumar and Brindavan Yadav kidnapped his minor daughter aged about 17 years. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64323 of 2022(2) dt.06-12-2022 2/2 submitted that victim and Sumit were knowing each other and were in love and perhaps eloped and petitioner being father of Sumit has been implicated falsely in order to coerce the entire family into submission. The learned counsel next submits that the victim has come back and her statement was recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. wherein she has not alleged anything against the petitioner. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bailbonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Lakhisarai P. S. Case No.591 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T