← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54624/2019bail rejected

Aliraj Mian v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-29Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54624 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2019 Thana- CHANPATIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== ALIRAJ MIAN Son of Late Dildaar Mian @ Jildar Miyan Resident of Village- Tirbhutiya Tola, P.S.- Chanpatia, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Chanpatia Police Station Case No. 136 of 2019, disclosing offence under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The allegation against the petitioner, as per the First Information Report, is that the meat shop of the petitioner was raided by the police and the police recovered 10 litres of illicit liquor from the said kabab shop of the petitioner. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicate in this case inasmuch as the hotel is a public place and so many customers come and if some illicit liquor has been found, the petitioner may not be held

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54624 of 2019(2) dt.29-08-2019 2/2 guilty for the same as the illicit liquor has been found where the member of the public visit frequently. Learned Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the shop, in question, does not belong to the petitioner.

After having heard learned Counsel for the parties concerned and taking into consideration the fact that from perusal of the First Information Report and the seizure list, it is apparent that the illicit liquor has been recovered from the kabab shop of the petitioner. Accordingly, on perusal of the First Information Report and the seizure list, a prima facie case is made out against the petitioner and in view of the Full Bench decision of this Court, in Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No. 431 of 2019 (Ram Vinay Yadav v. The State of Bihar), I am not inclined to exercise my discretion for grant of anticipatory bail. This application is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √ T √