Sudhanshu Shekhar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14151 of 2018 ====================================================== Sudhanshu Shekhar Son of Suresh Prasad Chaudhary, Resident of VillageLaxmipur, P.S.- Amarpur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through its Home Secretary, Home Department, Bihar, Patna 2.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Zonal Inspector General of Police, Patna Zone. 4.

The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Patna Division. 5.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna, Bihar. 6.

City Superintendent of Police, East Patna, Patna. 7.

The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Patna City, Patna. 8.

Inspector of Police, Bahadurpur Police Station, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ravi Verma, AC to GP 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 22-06-2020 The matter has been heard via video conferencing due to lockdown imposed on account of the COVID-19 pandemic.

2. Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ravi Verma, learned AC to GP 4 for the State.

3. The petitioner has moved the Court for the following relief:

"That this is an application for issuance of appropriate writ/writ(s)/order(s) direction(s) quashing the order contained in Memo No 8895 dated 11.07.2018 issued by Senior Superintendent of

Patna High Court CWJC No.14151 of 2018 dt.22-06-2020 2/2 Police, Patna by which petitioner has been suspended without either any enquiry pending against him or any enquiry in contemplation against him and on the ground based on totally misconceived and erroneous facts which is totally bad and illegal and further for any other relief(s) for which the petitioner may found entitled to."

4. At the outset, learned counsel for the State submitted that the grievance was against the suspension order dated 11.07.2018 and in terms of the order passed by the authority dated 03.01.2019, suspension of the petitioner has already stood revoked and further that after full-fledged departmental enquiry punishment has also been awarded.

5. Having regard to the fact that the writ petition had been filed assailing the suspension order and the same has been revoked on 03.01.2019 itself, nothing further remains in the writ petition and accordingly, the same stands disposed off. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Anjani/- AFR/NAFR U T