Sadanand Mandal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.40025 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -198 Year- 2016 Thana -BARHARA District- PURNIA ====================================================== Sadanand Mandal, son of Ganeshi Mandal, resident of village Sukhasan Kothi, P.S. Barhara, Distt. Purnea.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. i Lakshmi Kant Sharma, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 31-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Barhara P.S. Case No. 198 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added.
It has been submitted that name of the petitioner has come in the supervision note of S.D.P.O. Dhamdaha. As per allegation, the brother of the informant had gone from his house with Gourav Kumar, but he did not return. Later on, his dead body was found in a drain.
In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Barhara P.S. Case No. 198 of 2017, he shall be
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40025 of 2017 (2) dt.31-08-2017 2/2 released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri P.K. Mohit, learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 2nd, Purnea, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions
(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T