Patna High CourtCWJC/8353/2013dfd for non appearance

Anant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-25Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8353 of 2013 ====================================================== Anant Kumar S/O Late Vijay Bhushan Gosh R/O Mohalla- Sewa Nagar, P.S.-Civil Lines, Gaya, District- Gaya .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Magadh Division, P.S.- Civil Line, Gaya

2. The District Magistrate, P.S.- Civil Line, District- Gaya

3. The Secretary Cum Commissioner Food Supply And Commercial Department, Govt. Of Bihar, P.S.- Gandhi Maidan, Distt.- Patna

4. The Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, P.S.- Gaya, District- Gaya

5. The Deputy Secretary Food Supply And Commercial Department, Govt. Of Bihar, P.S.- Gandhi Maidan, Distt.- Patna

6. The Deputy Secretary Personnel And Administrative Reforms Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

7. The Conducting Officer Cum In-charge Officer Legal Section, Food Supply & Commercial Department, P.S.- Gaya Sadar, Gaya .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. Manoj Kumar Ambastha, SC 26 and Mr. Subodh Kumar, AC to SC 26 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 25-08-2018 None appears for the petitioner.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the State that without exhausting the remedy of appeal provided under the Bihar Government Servants (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 2005 the petitioner has approached this Court directly by filing the writ petition. He submits that the petitioner has caused substantive delay in completion of the proceeding and thereafter when punishment order has been passed he rushed to this Court without availing the efficacious remedy of appeal under the Bihar CCA Rules, 2005.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8353 of 2013 (7) dt.25-08-2018 2/2 Since none appears on behalf of the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the submission made on behalf of the State, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) Shashi.