Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38805/2017bail granted

Idish Khatoon @ Idrish Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-15Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38805 of 2017 (3) dt.15-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38805 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -33 Year- 2017 Thana -MAKHDUMPUR District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Idish Khatoon @ Idrish Sah Son of Shankar Mian, R/o VillageNandanpura, P.S.- Makhadumpur (Tehta O.P.), District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar Singh -5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case instituted under Sections 326 and 498-A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38805 of 2017 (3) dt.15-09-2017 petitioner is father-in-law of the victim. He is separate in mess and property from the husband of the victim. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State and the counsel for the informant, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the FIR. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Makhdumpur (Tehta O.P.) P.S. Case No. 33 of 2017 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T