Sarvhara Vikas Manch Through Treasurer Pinki Maya v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1802 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19026 of 2016 ====================================================== Sarvhara Vikas Manch Through Treasurer Pinki Maya W/o Sri Banshidhar Brajwasi R/o Village - Raksha @ Roksha, P.O. - Raksha, P.S. - Karja, District - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Mr. Anjani Kumar Singh, The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

Mr. R.K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Mr. R.L. Chungthu, The Joint Secretary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5.

Mr. Arvind Kumar Verma, The Director, Primary Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

6.

Mr. Brajesh Kumar Ojha, The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

7.

Mr. Md. Sohail, The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur. 8.

Mr. Lalan Prasad Singh, The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur. 9.

Mr. Mustufa Hussain Mansoori, The District Program Officer, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Manoj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Vinay Pd. Singh, AC to GA XII ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 27-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

The instant application has been filed for initiating contempt proceeding against the Contemnors/Opposite parties for willful violation of order dated 08.09.2017 passed in CWJC

Patna High Court MJC No.1802 of 2018(2) dt.27-02-2020 2/2 No. 19026 of 2016, titled as Sarvahara Vikas Manch as Treasurer Vs. The State of Bihar and Others, by a Division Bench of this Court and further for compliance of the order aforesaid in totality by the opposite parties. With the passage of time, the present petition has become infructuous and is, accordingly, disposed of reserving liberty to the writ petitioner or any other public spirited person to point out the deficiencies in implementing the provisions of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 to the authorities and take recourse to such remedies as are available under law.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) Rajeev Kumar/- U