Vikas Pandit @ Vikas Pandey @ Vikas Pandit v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58063 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-709 Year-2021 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== VIKAS PANDIT @ VIKAS PANDEY @ VIKAS PANDIT SON OF YOGI PANDIT @ YOGENDRA PANDEY R/O VILLAGE- ASHARHI, P.S. AND DISTRICT- NAWADA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 20-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

As per allegation in the FIR, while the informant was sitting outside his house along with his mother, petitioner along with co-accused Chintu Singh and other associates came there by three motorcycle. It is further alleged that petitioner and Chintu Singh fired pointing to Chandan Singh but the same hit to Chandan Kumar on his left hand. ON gathering of villagers, they fled away from there.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58063 of 2022(3) dt.20-02-2023 2/2 that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. As per para 9 of the petition, after prevailing good sense, compromise has took place between the parties and in support of this, compromise petition is annexed as Annexure-2 to this petition. Similarly situated other co-accused, namely, Chintu Singh has already been granted regular bail by a different co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 06.07.2022.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Nawada in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 709 of 2021.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U