Sachida Nand Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16351 of 2018 ====================================================== Sachida Nand Prasad, Son of Bilayati Singh, Resident of Village- Railly, Police Station- N.T.P.C., Barh, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Lakhisarai. 3.
The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Lakhisarai. 4.
The Circle Officer, Barahiya, Lakhisarai.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Niranjan Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Md. Majid Mahboob Khan, AC to AAG 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 22-06-2020 The matter has been heard via video conferencing due to lockdown imposed on account of the COVID-19 pandemic.
2. Heard Mr. Niranjan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Md. Majid Mahboob Khan, learned AC to AAG 12 for the State.
3. The petitioner has moved the Court for the following reliefs:
"(i) For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 06.07.2017 contained in Memo No. 658 issued by the District Magistrate, Lakhisarai, whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been suspended from his service with immediate effect.
(ii) For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus for directing the respondents to produce the letter no. 96/GO dated 6.03.2017 issued by the Secretary to the Commissioner,
Patna High Court CWJC No.16351 of 2018(4) dt.22-06-2020 2/2 Munger Commissionary, Munger, in pursuance of the said letter this petitioner has been suspended from his service and on production to quash the same.
(iii) For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to discharge his duties as Revenue clerk (Rajaswa Karamchari), Suryagarha and he was deputed to Circle Officer, Barahiya.
(iv) For any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case."
4. At the very outset, learned counsel for the State submitted that they have filed a counter affidavit stating that the suspension of the petitioner has already been revoked.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the position.
6. In view thereof, the writ petition having become infructuous, stands disposed off.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) Anand Kr./P. Kumar U