← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59077/2025allowed

Surya Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-11Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59077 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-760 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Gaya ====================================================== Surya Sharma S/o Ram Sewak Mistri R/o Mohalla- Hanuman Nagar, PSPatrakar Nagar, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 11-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 760 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, during vehicle checking, police apprehended a Honda City Car along with driver, on search total 360 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the said car.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case being the driver of the seized car. Nothing has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59077 of 2025(2) dt.11-09-2025 2/2 recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. He has no knowledge about the loaded liquor. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 19.07.2025. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the trial of the case.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the regular bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Gaya, in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 760 of 2025. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) khushbu/- U T