← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10373/2013dismissed

Rajesh Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-11Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10373 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Rajesh Kumar Mahto Son Of Chandrika Mahto Resident Of Village - Dihasonduo, P.S. Goraul, District - Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through Director General Of Police, Government Of Bihar, Patna l

2. The Inspector General Of Police Trihut Range, Muzaffarpur

3. The Superintendent House Officer, Goraul

4. The Station House Officer, Goraul

5. Rajendra Mahto Son Of Late Ramdeni Mahto Resident Of Village - Chandpurakala, P.S. Goraul, District - Vaishali

6. Smt. Renu Kumari D/O Rajendra Mahto Resident Of Village - Chandpurakala, P.S. Goraul, District - Vaishali

7. Surendra Singh Son Of Bhunnilal Mahto Resident Of Village - Narayanpur, P.S. Goraul, District - Vaishali

8. Manju Devi Wife Of Suresh Mahto Resident Of Village - Sondhokahartoli, P.S. Goraul, District - Vaishali At Present Member Of Jyotimahilla Organization Muzaffarpur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 11-02-2016 Heard.

The writ petitioner prays for a direction upon the respondents for instituting an FIR on the basis of a report submitted by the petitioner disclosing cognizable offence. Dispute between the husband and the wife prompted the peittioner to submit a written report.

In the counter affidavit the factual background has been enumerated by the respondents- Superintendent of Police,

Patna High Court CWJC No.10373 of 2013 (2) dt.11-02-2016 2/2 Vaishali.

The law itself provides remedy to the petitioner by approaching the court of competent jurisdiction for the relief for institution of a criminal proceeding.

Counsel for the State has rightly submitted that no direction, as prayed in this petition can be issued. The application stands dismissed.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) singh/- U