← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51613/2014withdrawn

Pradyut Kumar Choubey And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2019-04-03Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 51613 of 2014 Arising Out of Com plaint Case No.-188 Year-2014 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

Pradyut Kumar Choubey, son of Prakash Chand Choubey. 2.

Prakash Chand Choubey son of Late Brij Kishore Choubey. 3.

Bhawani Choubey wife of Prakash Chand Choubey. 4.

Prabhat Kumar Choubey son of Prakash Chand Choubey. All resident of Mohalla- Indra Nagar Laliyahi, P.O.- Katihar, P.S.- Shayak, District- Katihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Garima Kumari daughter of Umeshwar Chaturvedi wife of Pradyut Kumar Choubey, r/o Mohalla- Mithanpura, P.S. Mithanpura District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surya Narayan Sah, Advocate For the Informant :

Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 03-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.

2. The petitioners have moved the Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for the following relief:

"That the present application is being filed for quashing of order dated 15.10.2014 passed in Complaint Case No. 188/14, Tr. 2345/14 by which the learned S.D.J.M (East) Muzaffarpur has been pleased to took cognizance for an offence under section 498A I.P.C. and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51613 of 2014(4) dt.03-04-2019 2/2 under section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act against the petitioners."

3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the application.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 do not object.

5. In view thereof, as prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioners, the application stands disposed off as withdrawn.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U T