Ram Bilash Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.46257 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -24 Year- 2013 Thana -SC/ST District- BANKA ======================================================
1. Ram Bilash Yadav, son of Late Hari Yadav,
2. Kishore Yadav, son of Ram Bilash Yadav,
3. Dharma Yadav @ Dharmendra Yadav, son of Ram Bilash Yadav, all residents of village - Paharpur, P.S. Amarpur, District - Banka .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ambika Bhagat, Spl. PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 2/ 02-11-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.
The Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case instituted for the offence under Section(s) 341, 323, 447, 384, 427, 504, 506/34 Indian Penal Code.
Considering that there is land dispute between the parties and the Petitioners have fair antecedents, it is ordered that in the event of surrender/arrest of the Petitioners, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Banka SC/ST P.S. Case No.24 of 2013, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of `5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. and (i)
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46257 of 2015 (2) dt.02-11-2015 2/2 That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioners.
The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the Petitioners, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioners are not accused in any other case and, if they are, they shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the Petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv) That the Petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (v) That the Petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.
(Anjana Prakash, J) JA/- U T