Raghunandan Kumar @ Raghunandan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68908 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2021 Thana- SARSI District- Purnia ====================================================== RAGHUNANDAN KUMAR @ RAGHUNANDAN YADAV S/o Late Ganeshi Yadav Resident of Village - Radha Nagar, P.S. Banmankhi, District - Purnia.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dr. Bidhu Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-05-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within two weeks of the complete start of the physical Court in normal course.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sarsi P.S. Case No. 86 of 2021 for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution story, altogether cash of Rs.1,50,000/- was robbed from the possession of the informant who was the staff of one Pankaj Kumar Chaudhary. The said amount was collected by the informant on behalf of Raja Gupta. Petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68908 of 2021(2) dt.17-05-2022 2/3 submits that the petitioner has been implicated in a false case. Petitioner has clean antecedent. No recovery has been made from possession of the petitioner. Backdrop of the incidence is that there was collision of the petitioner's motorcycle with the informant's motorcycle and due to some altercation for the said, a false case has been built up against the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 07.08.2021.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

Taking into consideration the nature of allegation made against the petitioner, petitioner has clean antecedent and the period of custody already undergone by the petitioner, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Purnea in connection with Sarsi P.S. Case No. 86 of 2021, subject to the following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68908 of 2021(2) dt.17-05-2022 3/3

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence, after his release on bail, the trial Court shall take steps to cancel his bail bonds.

(Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- U T