Patna High CourtMJC/2085/2018withdrawn

Suman Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through Arbind Kumar Chaudhary, The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Departme

2023-01-30Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah,Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2085 of 2018 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10640 of 2017 ====================================================== Suman Kumar Singh, Son of - Late Diwakar Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Borra, P.S.- Amdanda, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Arbind Kumar Chaudhary, The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. Arbind Kumar Chaudhary, the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Adesh Titarmere, the District Magistrate, Bhagalpur.

4. Sahadat Husain, Panchayati Raj Officer, Bhagalpur.

5. Arbind Kumar, the Block Development Officer, Bhagalpur.

6. Ashok Kumar Singh, Panchayat Secretary, Borra Pathakdih, Sanhaula, P.S.- Amadanda, District- Bhagalpur.

7. Jagat Chaudhary, Mukhiya, Borra Pathakdih, P.S. - Amadanda, District- Bhagalpur.

8. Sanjay Sah, Proprietor, Subham Enterprises, Narayan Complex (Beloe Vijaya Complex), Gurudwara Road, Bhagalpur, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shankar Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Pushkar Narayan Shahi, AAG 6 ======================================================

Patna High Court MJC No.2085 of 2018(2) dt.30-01-2023 2/2 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR) 30-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present contempt application, the order under contempt has been complied with and, as such, the matter has become infructuous.

3. Learned counsel for the State reiterates and affirms the statements made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. In view of the above, the present contempt application stands disposed of.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) (Harish Kumar, J) Arish/- U